Friday, 11 October 2013

Chinese Visual Festival - Disorder by Huang Weikai


Thanks to my Chinese Cinemas lecturer two days ago I had the chance to see one of those films that will be very difficult to find anywhere else.
The screening was at KCL and the chosen film was Disorder, montage documentary by Huang Weikai.
The film won the Chinese Visual Festival Jury 1st Prize this year accompanied by this comment:
"Disorder is an exciting and anarchic revival of the city symphony documentary that reveals the cruel energy of China's social transformation."

"There meaning and methos to the madness, and Huang creates a montage laden with meaning by playing off unrelated scenes of fake traffic accidents, police action and rampaging pigs with shots of everyday people simply going about their lives to suggest imagined narratives and shared experiences."

I found the film extremely interesting not only from a formal point of view, but also in terms of ideas and concept. It had the incredible quality of resembling human stream of conscioussness suggesting an association of images to the audience, whose responsibility is to connect all the pieces and understand the content hidden behind the form.



 Since it is very interesting and the chance of finding it online is quite rare I will write the interview with the director contained in the event's handout.

James Mudge: Amongst other things, the film's title suggests chaos, and this definitely comes across very strongly when watching it - what message or themes were you trying to convey?

Huang Weikai: My film showed the absurdity of city life. The news we read every day is always more "amazing" than a novel or movie. Sometimes we can't help asking whose city this is. We choose the cosmopolitan living lifestyle, while it brings us a lot of things that are unreasonable and unpredictable. Therefore we need to reflect on it.

JM: Can you tell me a little bit more about how the film was made? I believe it was pulled together from thousands of hours of footage - who shot this and how did you go about editing it together?

HW: Between 2008 and 2009, I collected various footage shot by amateur cameramen. I watched around 1000 hours of footage, then decided to make a city symphony of my own. None of the previous city symphony documentaries made before seemed to feature the voice of reality, like Walter Ruttmann's Berlin Symphony, Dziga Vertov's Man with a Movie Camera and Godfrey Reggio's Life out of Balance. The first two films were made in the silent film era, and the last one uses electronic music. This time, now in the DVD era, I told myself I could not use a soundtrack. Now the city symphony is mixed with various sounds and episodes. I knitted them together like knitting a sweater, with the design and style of the current age.

JM: The black and white look is very distinct - why not colour?

HW: There are two reasons. The first is because the footage came from different cameras, the quality and colours vary and therefore they need a unified style. Another reason is I used to learn Chinese ink painting and therefore prefer presenting pictures in black and white. I made quite a lot of adjustment in the black and white pictures as well. For example, I enhanced the contrast and turned almost all the skies in the city into pure white. Some of the original footage is grainy and some is not. I turned them all into the grainy ones in the final film.

JM: It's a radical approach that's very different to other Chinese documentaries, and which makes the film really quite unique - why did you choose to make it in this way?

HW: The feetless bird in Wong Kai Wai's Days of Being Wild initially came from Godard's Bande à Part. Two novels from Latin American were published on the similar subject before Alain Robbe-Grillet made his L'Année Dernière à Marienbad. Quentin Tarantino could not have made his Reservoir Dogs without watching Ringo Lam's City on Fire. No matter how original a film looks like, it must have its elements from some work which came before. I want to just try something a little different with each one of my works.

JM: Are there any other artists or directors, from China or around the world, whose works you admire or who have influenced you?

HW: I like Godard and Wong Kai Wai's films. However, I would like to quote a Chinese writer, Yu Hua's words to answer this question. He said: "The predecessor writes influence to those after them is like sunlight to trees. A tree will grow under the sun, but more importantly, it will grow up like a tree instead of like a sun. All writers' growth will be healthy and they will be themselves instead of like someone else." Directors are the same.

JM: What's your opinion on the modern Chinese documentary film making scene and how it has been developing in recent years?

HW: I am just one of the filmmakers and I admit my vision is not wide enough to see the picture of the whole Chinese documentary making world. However, I notice many of my friends begin to get interested in documentaries and many start to film by themselves. I believe more and more will join in the group.

JM: I know you've been invited to be a visiting scholar in New York, and have taken Disorder to a lot of different film festivals around the world - how different is it making films in and about China?

HW: I only know about independent documentary making in China. When most people start filming, they usually would ignore or care little about sound of the film and would just focus on the subject of the film. I witnessed documentary making in the US just once or twice but I hardly know enough to comment.


Thursday, 10 October 2013

The Rest is Noise Festival - Southbank Centre

"I wanted to tell the story of the 20th century through  it music." 
Alex Ross, author of The Rest Is Noise

As mentioned in my previous post I want to talk about The Rest Is Noise Festival inspired by Alex Ross' book and hosted by the Southbank Centre.
The Festival has been going on since January 2013 and here is a little recap of the past events:

"The first half of 2013 has seen us take a fascinating journey through the music of the 20th century. We started at 1900, when the world was on the brink of imploding into the First World War, and travelled through the end of the Second World War, just as America's star was on the rise and the Iron Curtain drew an impenetrable barrier across a shattered Europe.
During this time we provided a map for audiences that included talks, films, debates and concerts to help explain the relationship between classical music and the social and political changes of the last century. This approach, inspired by Alex Ross' book The Rest Is Noise, has allowed us to see the music of that period 'in the round' - bringing in the history of science, technology, philosophical and political movements."
Jude Kelly, Artistic Director, Southbank Centre

On the last weekend of this October the time will go back to 1960s and for only £15 for the day pass or £25 for the weekend pass, these are all the things you can see:

Saturday 26 

Film Screenings: Heimat 2 and much more besides
Tariq Ali. In this keynote talk the author and activist discusses a radical decade and key figures such as Henry Kissinger and Malcolm X
Stephen Montague. Listen to This Get to know the music of the 1960s
Pop Art. An overview of the transatlantic movement which dominated the 1960s art world
Marina Frolova Walker. Director of Studies in Music, Cambridge, discusses Shostakovich in the 1960s
May '68. The students protests that turned into one of the most powerful moments of the 1960s

Sunday 27

The Beat Generation. Explore the words and music of the 1960s underground
Zappa on Zappa. Gail Zappa speaks about her husband Frank
The Beatles. Discussion on the early years of the legendary band, based on new biographical material
Joe Boyd. The producer and writer in conversation about the 1960s
Roger McGough & Brian Patten. The legendary Mersey poets read poems and celebrate Liverpool in the 1960s
Angela Davis. Legendary civil rights activist looks back on a decade of revolution
Yellow Submarine

These are only some of the exciting activities going on during that weekend, and among the November ones I will just mention a couple such as: 

Hanif Kureishi about tensions in Thatcherite Britain
Layla Alexander-Garrat, Tarkovsky's on-set-translator, speaks about the legendary film director
Film Music of the 1970s: the great film scores from John Williams to Bernard Herrman


"What do two world wars, votes for women and a moon landing sound like?
Here comes the 20th century."

Tuesday, 8 October 2013

2001: A Space Odyssey Featuring Philarmonia Orchestra and Chorus


Yesterday night I probably attended the most emotional event of my life so far. Since I am obsessed with Kubrick's work I just couldn't miss the occasion of rewatching his masterpiece with live orchestra at the Royal Festival Hall.
The event was presented in association with BFI with support from Warner Bros.

A Word from Christiane Kubrick about Stanley Kubrick

"Stanley was very happy when he came across Richard Strauss' Thus Spoke Zarathustra. For him it expressed the overwhelming thoughts and longings we all feel when we as children look at the sun and the moon and the stars. How wonderful it would be if we could know more, understand more and be a million times smarter. That's what I feel today when I am looking at the latest Hubble telescope-wonders. Last time he was at Royal Festival Hall Stanley heard Verdi's Requiem; he could never have imagined that his film 2001: A Space Odyssey would years later be projected in this very hall over a live orchestra performance. Stanley was interested in the politics of power and his film expresses a deep wish for humanity to survive and to escape self-destruction. Is there outside help? Can we count on it? Stanley was not religious, but, like most of us, speculated in the face of the unknowable, hidden in an endless universe in which our little planet may not play any role at all. But it's all we have - it is a world to us."


Music and films are for me the most powerful combination of arts. As the amazing conductor, Benjamin Wallfisch, started preparing for the big opening sequence, my heart was pounding, I was feeling the whole range of emotions that the film text, the immensity of the universe, and the glorious Strauss' music, could possibly suscitate. 
The most impressive thing was that the conductor standing in front of the screen and his orchestra, directing all the elements, checking the timing and emotional impact of the musical language, was like Kubrick. In that moment he became the director, feeling, suffering, for his work of art. And entering someone else's feeling and their intensity is not something everyone can do.
I want to thank the Philarmonia Orchestra, whose work is of immense importance. Thank you for giving me a new and different way of looking at one of my favourite films of all time.
Don't miss out my next post in which I will talk about the The Rest is Noise Festival, and about the great events you can attend during the next three months.



Thursday, 3 October 2013

Blue Jasmine: Woody Allen in a New York State of Mind


Last week I finally went to see Woody Allen's new film, Blue Jasmine, starring the wonderful Cate Blanchett, at the Ritzy Picturehouse in Brixton.
This will not be a long review, nor a scholar article. I just want to share with you what caught me more in this exquisite picture.
First of all, something concerning the director's path as an auteur in my personal experience. I grew up watching Woody Allen's films with my dad, I watched Annie Hall (my absolute favourite), Manhattan, Zelig, Hannah and Her Sisters, The Purple Rose of Cairo, Take the Money and Run, Bananas, Crimes and Misdemeanors, Manhattan Murder Mystery, Matchpoint, Vicky Cristina Barcelona.
Suddenly I watched his new films without finding without finding that old New Yorker. And I know things change, and I also think it is very important for an artist of his level to be able to take risks. But, let's be honest. His last releases cannot possibly be compared to his old masterpieces, if not for the stable theme of couples forming and dismantling.
From the minute the film started, I had no more doubts, he is back with a suitcase full of his artistic life's experience, ready to move forward without forgetting the past.
The dicotomy past/future, expressed through the editing in Jasmine's flashbacks, is a constant in the film. But how does it involve the director even more than the character itself?
Woody Allen has set his films in the most different cities, but New York New York, and the Manhattan lifestyle, have always been a personal and artistic leitmotiv throughout his career.
Thinking about him as a character in his films, I have always noticed that the ones in which he looks like he is acting as himself, not as a character, are always the films having New York as a setting.
Annie Hall is a great example in terms of study of one's own life through the critical and objective eye of the camera. His story with Diane Keaton did not work out well? And there they are, together, telling us about the story of an unsuccessful, but great, lovestory. 
New York is the setting of Jasmine's flashbacks, of the high society parties in Manhattan, the patinate and glamorous life, and the fashion.
This last thing is what Jasmine materially brings with her when she moves to her sister in San Francisco: the Hermés bag is the physical hemblem of her link to the past.


My point is that Woody Allen, the director, and Woody Allen, the New Yorker, met again to cross the past boundaries together and, as the protagonist, try to accept the future. 
The differences between the cities are also emblematic: New York and San Francisco are geographically opposed, East and West Coast, the difference of accent, of lifestyle, etc.
The memory of New York will always stay, but Jasmine has to let it go. The rest of the world is out there, and the City of Allen's childhood, and his work of the 70s has changed now, and so have we.
This is only my personal opinion, of course, but I took this as personal life-lesson, and one of the greatest.
Shall we now talk about Cate Blanchett? Not only her appearance and elegance make her stand out from the crowd, creating again a contrast between lifestyles: she shines next to the people in San Francisco, and when she suddenly finds the man who remembers her about the past (elegant, glamorous, rich), it doesn't work. She was not meant to go back to that kind of life, to be stuck in the perfect coverstory marriage. Jasmine has to fix a more important thing first: herself.
This is A Film.
The script: brilliant, humorous, modern, Allen. 
The cast: Oscar performance by Cate Blanchett, great interpretation by the co-actors Alec Baldwin, Bobby Cannavale, Sally Hawkins and Louis C.K.
The directing: smooth, psychoanalytical, mixing the style of comedies and melodramas.


This, in fact, reminds me of similarities between Blue Jasmine and Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown (Pedro Almodovar, 1988). The narrative construction around the film female characters, the attitude Al has towards women, all kinds of women, exactly like Ivan in Pepa's dream-sequence. 
My last point, since I am not writing a long essay, concerns what I was mentioning about screenwriting in my previous post: http://artbookscinema.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/screenwriters-on-screenwriting-tony.html
Tony Gilroy said that to do this job one has to know human behaviour, have empathy.
Woody Allen, his anxietes, his fears impersonated by himself or projected on the characters, his deep study of psychoanalysis and philosophy just gave me one thought.
No wonder he has become one of the most established directors of the 20th Century, they say you either have it or you don't, and he definitely has it and even more. 
In conclusion, dear Mr. Allen, I will be waiting for the next great picture. Thank you. 

Wednesday, 2 October 2013

Screenwriters on Screenwriting: Tony Gilroy

Second year has started, and I've been a little busy trying to readjust to the rhythm of the course (and the lenght of the readings).
However, last Sunday I had the pleasure to attend another screenwriting event, a lecture lead by Tony Gilroy.



As I did with Susannah Grant, here's a list of his greatest works:

The Cutting Edge (1992)
Dolores Claiborne (1995)
The Devil's Avocate (1997), co-writer
Armageddon (1998), co-writer
Proof of Life (2000)
The Bourne Identity (2002), co-writer
The Bourne Supremacy (2004)
The Bourne Ultimatum (2007), co-writer
Michael Clayton (2007), writer and director
Duplicity (2009), writer and director
The Bourne Legacy (2012), director and co-writer

Nominations and Awards:

Academy Awards Nomination for Best Direction and Best Original Screenplay for Michael Clayton
Saturn Award Nomination for The Devil's Advocate
BAFTA Awards Nomination for The Bourne Ultimatum
BAFTA Awards Nomination for Michael Clayton
Boston Society of Film Critics Awards (2nd Place) for Michael Clayton
Broadcast Film Critics Association Awards Nomination for Michael Clayton
Chicago Film Critics Association Awards Nomination for Michael Clayton
Directors Guild of America for Michael Clayton
Edgar Allan Poe Awards Won for Michael Clayton
Edgar Allan Poe Awards Nomination for The Bourne Supremacy
Online Film Critics Society Awards Nomination for Michael Clayton
Satellite Awards Nomination for Michael Clayton
Toronto Film Critics Association Awards Nomination for Michael Clayton
USC Scripter Award Nomination for The Bourne Supremacy
Venice Film Festival Golden Lion Nomination for Michael Clayton
Writers Guild of America Nomination for Michael Clayton

First of all, Mr. Gilroy decided to give a lecture about the thing he knows the most: how to build an original screenplay. 
We have to remember that screenwriting is an imaginative work, and because of this it is unteachable.
This is why it's always good to start from something small and specific. Our characters have to rise from the dialogue.
But here is what made me think the most: to be a good screenwriter, one must know human behaviour, one must have empathy and when writing the outline be able to feel every scene as real. One has to see what he/she is writing. 


Tony Gilroy has had an interesting family life: son of a screenwriter who didn't want his children to end up in the industry, and here they are now: three sons, one editor, two screenwriters. Having a brother as a screenwriter, from what I understood during the meeting, is also very funny in terms of working on each other's work, advicing, and especially formatting: Mr. Gilroy described both his brother and him as "formatting freaks."
He sold his first screenplay when he was 30, before he had been doing the most different kinds of jobs, and, especially, that of musician. At some point he realized he could do much better as a writer, however the musician job earned him a great skill, fundamental to the film industry: he learned how to be a very good collaborator, which as screenwriter, and part of the film process, is something one should always be.
A very good exercise he and his brother did was reading screenplays, try to find the most of them, and read, learn through them. In fact, the more experienced you are the more you realize your screenplays become less and less dialogue, and more and more camera work.
During the Q&A he said two things I will add to my quotes Moleskine:
1. We have to get visually excited about what we're writing. (that's the way to make it work)
2. We should be directing every script we're writing before the director.
Last, but not least, his advice on writing action scenes:

  • write what you know
  • write what you see
  • keep it real
  • be specific
I was pleased to notice some similarities in explaining how the screenwriter's works during the two lectures I attended. Even though these two screenwriters couldn't be more different, they both underlined the pros and cons of the job, the risks one has to take, but, they both showed the love for their job, which should be everyone's goal in life. Not to end up doing something for money or to please others, but reach what you love because that is where you'll succeed.

I leave you with my favourite quote from The Bourne Identity, and the unforgettable Al Pacino's speech in The Devil's Advocate:

"How could I forget about you? You're the only person I know."

"Let me give you a little inside information about God. God likes to watch. He's a prankster. Think about it. He gives man instincts. He gives you this extraordinary gift, and then what does He do, I swear for His own amusement, his own private, cosmic gag reel, He sets the rules in opposition. It's the goof of all time. Look but don't touch. Touch, but don't taste. Taste, don't swallow. Ahaha. And while you're jumpin' from one foot to the next, what is he doing? He's laughin' His sick, fuckin' ass off! He's a tight-ass! He's a SADIST! He's an absentee landlord! Worship that? NEVER!"




Sunday, 29 September 2013

Screenwriters on Screenwriting: Susannah Grant


Since I moved to London last year the Screenwriting Lectures organized by the BFI and the BAFTA have always been my favourite moments.
Yesterday I had both the honour and pleasure of attending a lecture by Susannah Grant.
If you don't know this name, well here's a list of some of her greatest works:


Pocahontas (1995)
28 Days (2000)
Erin Brockovich (2000)
In Her Shoes (2005)
Catch and Release (2006)
Charlotte's Web (2006)
The Soloist (2009)

And titles like these couldn't not have awarded her with important nominations such as:

Academy Award nomination for Erin Brockovich
BAFTA Film Award nomination for Erin Brockovich
Edgar Allan Poe Awards nomination for Erin Brockovich
Las Vegas Film Critics Society Awards WON for Erin Brockovich
PEN Center USA West Literary Awards WON for Erin Brockovich
Satellite Awards nomination for Erin Brockovich
Writers Guild of America WON
Writers Guild of America nomination for Erin Brockovich

She revealed to be the kind of screenwriter I aspire to be, I felt like she was talking to me and telling me what I've been waiting to hear for years.
First of all, the fact that she, as me, comes from a background in which people prefer discouraging you from your dreams, and from a career in films. Most people I know just look at me thinking:
"Where do you think the film career will take you in life?"
Well, this is what I believe in.
Screenwriters make something out of nothing, they have the ability of making the invisible visible.
Her revelation film was Network (1976) by Paddy Chayefsky. And this is the scene she showed us: 


Going to the movie theatre has been her youth's greatest pleasure, especially because of the love she has for the whole movie-going experience. 
She reminded us that everyone has a unique voice and we don't have to be afraid to spread it: it could be admired by a huge audience, or by a minor one, but it's still our voice, the one and only.
However, the greatest thing that I was expecting to hear was this...
"I write myself into everything. With films is like getting a whole bonus life."
And this is exactly what I've always done since I first held a pen in my hands, and this is what I'll keep doing, knowing that someone who had my own fears and not a lot of support, really made it.

Last, but not least, here's her advice to aspiring screenwriters. Polite Persistence. 
Thank you Susannah, I will keep a note with these two Ps, and remember to look at it when the future gets harder. And this is my thank you:

From how a person talks you can understand she/he is a writer. It couldn't have been more evident with this woman. She was born to tell stories. 

I leave you with some of the best lines written by Susannah:

"Even a pain in the ass needs someone to take care of them."
28 Days

"That's all you got lady. Two wrong feet in fucking ugly shoes."
Erin Brockovich

"I hope you sleep well Mr. Lopez. I hope the whole world sleeps well."
The Soloist






Saturday, 28 September 2013

The Observer's Philip French receiving BFI Fellowship


On Wednesday I had the pleasure to attend my first BFI Fellowship ceremony. And this honour is even greater when received by a film critic for his stunning contribution to the film industry.
Philip French, the legendary The Observer's film critic, retired after 50 years at the age of 80. His career had begun back in 1963, and he has been defined as Britain's "greatest living movie analyst."
Not only did he lead one of the best and most read columns of the country, but he is also the author of great books such as:

  • I found it at the Movies: Reflections of a Cinephile
  • Westerns: Aspects of a Movie Genre 
  • The BFI Film Classics on Wild Strawberries

The interview was great, first of all because it was conduced by Mr French's choice of some of his favourite moments in films. You will have the chance to watch them in a few lines.
One of the things I was most pleased with was the relevance he has as a critic especially because he is capable of making connections between films and different forms of art: theatre, literature, etc. which is what I am always trying to do. So I want to thank this wonderful writer, for being another great inspiration.

The first moment Philip French chose is from his favourite genre: the Western. Sequence from the delightful Stagecoach (1939) John Ford's first western after the coming of sound.
Since I couldn't find the sequence, keep reading and it will be explained.
After the clip there was a reflection on the importance of John Ford and this film, quoting the famous words of Orson Welles:

"I prefer the old masters, by which I mean John Ford, John Ford, and John Ford."
(And his statement about watching Stagecoach over 40 times while writing Citizen Kane.)

Also the novel that inspired French's love for films, The Movie Goer (1961) by Walker Percy, quotes the film:
“The fact is I am quite happy in a movie,even a bad movie...What I remember
is the time John Wayne killed three men
with a carbine as he was falling to the
dusty street in Stagecoach, and the time
the kitten found Orson Welles in the doorway in The Third Man.”

The following clip is, in fact, from The Third Man (1949) by Carol Reed:


The following three moments where then connected to the uncredited cameo appeareances by three of his favourite writers:

1. Raymond Chandler in Double Indemnity (1944) by Billy Wilder (watch out for the man reading the newspaper):


2. Jorge Luis Borges in Performance (1970) by Donald Cammell and Nicolas Roeg , I couldn't find the exact scene but here are a video about the making of the film, and the link to the Borges' reference in it:


3. Graham Greene in Day For Night (1963) by Francois Truffaut, I wasn't able to find this one either, but here's Philip French's review:


Mr. French moved then to the British realism, with a beautiful sequence from Secrets & Lies (1996) by Mike Leigh: ( I apologize for the bad quality of the video).


I really liked the definition he gave of this clip: "It's an highly cinematic clip." All in long-take as you can see, which makes it so cinematic because, as Mr. French said, "you see the characters reacting to each other."

The clip from The Chess Players (1977) by Satyajit Ray, was incredible, I apologize because I couldn't find it. However, I am glad this meeting basically gave me a whole list of films to watch.

And, then, one of the last clips, the most significant one. It isn't only a film clip, it is a reflection on life, on a life-time career, and also a salute to 50 years of unforgettable words. Clip from A Late Quartet (2012) by Yaron Zilberman.
Watch it, and then you will feel as I felt in the cinema, it really moved me, so I cannot even imagine how emotional and thrilling that moment must have been for Mr. French.
Thank you again for your reviews, your humour, your kindness and honesty. As The Observer's editor John Mulholland said:

"There are readers who will feel that his writings are simply irreplaceable."

I leave you, as he did, with his last chosen clip, which I fortunately found. From Woody Allen's Hannah and her Sisters (1986):